Integrative analysis of DNA replication origins and ORC-/MCM-binding sites in human cells reveals a lack of overlap.

Based on experimentally determined average inter-origin distances of ~100 kb, DNA replication initiates from ~50,000 origins on human chromosomes in each cell cycle. The origins are believed to be specified by binding of factors like the origin recognition complex (ORC) or CTCF or other features like G-quadruplexes. We have performed an integrative analysis of 113 genome-wide human origin profiles (from five different techniques) and five ORC-binding profiles to critically evaluate whether the most reproducible origins are specified by these features. Out of ~7.5 million union origins identified by all datasets, only 0.27% (20,250 shared origins) were reproducibly obtained in at least 20 independent SNS-seq datasets and contained in initiation zones identified by each of three other techniques, suggesting extensive variability in origin usage and identification. Also, 21% of the shared origins overlap with transcriptional promoters, posing a conundrum. Although the shared origins overlap more than union origins with constitutive CTCF-binding sites, G-quadruplex sites, and activating histone marks, these overlaps are comparable or less than that of known transcription start sites, so that these features could be enriched in origins because of the overlap of origins with epigenetically open, promoter-like sequences. Only 6.4% of the 20,250 shared origins were within 1 kb from any of the ~13,000 reproducible ORC-binding sites in human cancer cells, and only 4.5% were within 1 kb of the ~11,000 union MCM2-7-binding sites in contrast to the nearly 100% overlap in the two comparisons in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Thus, in human cancer cell lines, replication origins appear to be specified by highly variable stochastic events dependent on the high epigenetic accessibility around promoters, without extensive overlap between the most reproducible origins and currently known ORC- or MCM-binding sites.

SMARCAL1 ubiquitylation controls its association with RPA-coated ssDNA and promotes replication fork stability.

Impediments in replication fork progression cause genomic instability, mutagenesis, and severe pathologies. At stalled forks, RPA-coated single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) activates the ATR kinase and directs fork remodeling, 2 key early events of the replication stress response. RFWD3, a recently described Fanconi anemia (FA) ubiquitin ligase, associates with RPA and promotes its ubiquitylation, facilitating late steps of homologous recombination (HR). Intriguingly, RFWD3 also regulates fork progression, restart and stability via poorly understood mechanisms. Here, we used proteomics to identify putative RFWD3 substrates during replication stress in human cells. We show that RFWD3 interacts with and ubiquitylates the SMARCAL1 DNA translocase directly in vitro and following DNA damage in vivo. SMARCAL1 ubiquitylation does not trigger its subsequent proteasomal degradation but instead disengages it from RPA thereby regulating its function at replication forks. Proper regulation of SMARCAL1 by RFWD3 at stalled forks protects them from excessive MUS81-mediated cleavage in response to UV irradiation, thereby limiting DNA replication stress. Collectively, our results identify RFWD3-mediated SMARCAL1 ubiquitylation as a novel mechanism that modulates fork remodeling to avoid genome instability triggered by aberrant fork processing.

Real-time monitoring of replication errors' fate reveals the origin and dynamics of spontaneous mutations.

The efficiency of replication error repair is a critical factor governing the emergence of mutations. However, it has so far been impossible to study this efficiency at the level of individual cells and to investigate if it varies within isogenic cell populations. In addition, why some errors escape repair remains unknown. Here we apply a combination of fluorescent labelling of the Escherichia coli Mismatch Repair (MMR) complex, microfluidics, and time-lapse microscopy, to monitor in real-time the fate of >20000 replication errors. We show that i) many mutations result from errors that are detected by MMR but inefficiently repaired ii) this limited repair efficiency is due to a temporal constraint imposed by the transient nature of the DNA strand discrimination signal, a constraint that is likely conserved across organisms, and iii) repair capacity varies from cell to cell, resulting in a subpopulation of cells with higher mutation rate. Such variations could influence the fitness and adaptability of populations, accelerating for instance the emergence of antibiotic resistance.

Starting DNA Synthesis: Initiation Processes during the Replication of Chromosomal DNA in Humans.

The initiation reactions of DNA synthesis are central processes during human chromosomal DNA replication. They are separated into two main processes: the initiation events at replication origins, the start of the leading strand synthesis for each replicon, and the numerous initiation events taking place during lagging strand DNA synthesis. In addition, a third mechanism is the re-initiation of DNA synthesis after replication fork stalling, which takes place when DNA lesions hinder the progression of DNA synthesis. The initiation of leading strand synthesis at replication origins is regulated at multiple levels, from the origin recognition to the assembly and activation of replicative helicase, the Cdc45-MCM2-7-GINS (CMG) complex. In addition, the multiple interactions of the CMG complex with the eukaryotic replicative DNA polymerases, DNA polymerase α-primase, DNA polymerase δ and ε, at replication forks play pivotal roles in the mechanism of the initiation reactions of leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis. These interactions are also important for the initiation of signalling at unperturbed and stalled replication forks, "replication stress" events, via ATR (ATM-Rad 3-related protein kinase). These processes are essential for the accurate transfer of the cells' genetic information to their daughters. Thus, failures and dysfunctions in these processes give rise to genome instability causing genetic diseases, including cancer. In their influential review "Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions", Hanahan and Weinberg (2022) therefore call genome instability a fundamental function in the development process of cancer cells. In recent years, the understanding of the initiation processes and mechanisms of human DNA replication has made substantial progress at all levels, which will be discussed in the review.

Parental histone transfer caught at the replication fork.

In eukaryotes, DNA compacts into chromatin through nucleosomes1,2. Replication of the eukaryotic genome must be coupled to the transmission of the epigenome encoded in the chromatin3,4. Here we report cryo-electron microscopy structures of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) replisomes associated with the FACT (facilitates chromatin transactions) complex (comprising Spt16 and Pob3) and an evicted histone hexamer. In these structures, FACT is positioned at the front end of the replisome by engaging with the parental DNA duplex to capture the histones through the middle domain and the acidic carboxyl-terminal domain of Spt16. The H2A-H2B dimer chaperoned by the carboxyl-terminal domain of Spt16 is stably tethered to the H3-H4 tetramer, while the vacant H2A-H2B site is occupied by the histone-binding domain of Mcm2. The Mcm2 histone-binding domain wraps around the DNA-binding surface of one H3-H4 dimer and extends across the tetramerization interface of the H3-H4 tetramer to the binding site of Spt16 middle domain before becoming disordered. This arrangement leaves the remaining DNA-binding surface of the other H3-H4 dimer exposed to additional interactions for further processing. The Mcm2 histone-binding domain and its downstream linker region are nested on top of Tof1, relocating the parental histones to the replisome front for transfer to the newly synthesized lagging-strand DNA. Our findings offer crucial structural insights into the mechanism of replication-coupled histone recycling for maintaining epigenetic inheritance.

Coordination of histone chaperones for parental histone segregation and epigenetic inheritance.

Chromatin-based epigenetic memory relies on the accurate distribution of parental histone H3-H4 tetramers to newly replicated DNA strands. Mcm2, a subunit of the replicative helicase, and Dpb3/4, subunits of DNA polymerase ε, govern parental histone H3-H4 deposition to the lagging and leading strands, respectively. However, their contribution to epigenetic inheritance remains controversial. Here, using fission yeast heterochromatin inheritance systems that eliminate interference from initiation pathways, we show that a Mcm2 histone binding mutation severely disrupts heterochromatin inheritance, while mutations in Dpb3/4 cause only moderate defects. Surprisingly, simultaneous mutations of Mcm2 and Dpb3/4 stabilize heterochromatin inheritance. eSPAN (enrichment and sequencing of protein-associated nascent DNA) analyses confirmed the conservation of Mcm2 and Dpb3/4 functions in parental histone H3-H4 segregation, with their combined absence showing a more symmetric distribution of parental histone H3-H4 than either single mutation alone. Furthermore, the FACT histone chaperone regulates parental histone transfer to both strands and collaborates with Mcm2 and Dpb3/4 to maintain parental histone H3-H4 density and faithful heterochromatin inheritance. These results underscore the importance of both symmetric distribution of parental histones and their density at daughter strands for epigenetic inheritance and unveil distinctive properties of parental histone chaperones during DNA replication.

Safeguarding the epigenome through the cell cycle: a multitasking game.

Sustaining cell identity and function across cell division is germane to human development, healthspan, and cancer avoidance. This relies significantly on propagation of chromatin organization between cell generations, as chromatin presents a barrier to cell fate and cell state conversions. Inheritance of chromatin states across the many cell divisions required for development and tissue homeostasis represents a major challenge, especially because chromatin is disrupted to allow passage of the DNA replication fork to synthesize the two daughter strands. This process also leads to a twofold dilution of epigenetic information in histones, which needs to be accurately restored for faithful propagation of chromatin states across cell divisions. Recent research has identified distinct multilayered mechanisms acting to propagate epigenetic information to daughter strands. Here, we summarize key principles of how epigenetic information in parental histones is transferred across DNA replication and how new histones robustly acquire the same information postreplication, representing a core component of epigenetic cell memory.

Bacillus subtilis remains translationally active after CRISPRi-mediated replication initiation arrest.

Initiation of bacterial DNA replication takes place at the origin of replication (oriC), a region characterized by the presence of multiple DnaA boxes that serve as the binding sites for the master initiator protein DnaA. This process is tightly controlled by modulation of the availability or activity of DnaA and oriC during development or stress conditions. Here, we aimed to uncover the physiological and molecular consequences of stopping replication in the model bacterium Bacillus subtilis. We successfully arrested replication in B. subtilis by employing a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats interference (CRISPRi) approach to specifically target the key DnaA boxes 6 and 7, preventing DnaA binding to oriC. In this way, other functions of DnaA, such as a transcriptional regulator, were not significantly affected. When replication initiation was halted by this specific artificial and early blockage, we observed that non-replicating cells continued translation and cell growth, and the initial replication arrest did not induce global stress conditions such as the SOS response.IMPORTANCEAlthough bacteria constantly replicate under laboratory conditions, natural environments expose them to various stresses such as lack of nutrients, high salinity, and pH changes, which can trigger non-replicating states. These states can enable bacteria to (i) become tolerant to antibiotics (persisters), (ii) remain inactive in specific niches for an extended period (dormancy), and (iii) adjust to hostile environments. Non-replicating states have also been studied because of the possibility of repurposing energy for the production of additional metabolites or proteins. Using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats interference (CRISPRi) targeting bacterial replication initiation sequences, we were able to successfully control replication initiation in Bacillus subtilis. This precise approach makes it possible to study non-replicating phenotypes, contributing to a better understanding of bacterial adaptive strategies.

Origin, evolution, and maintenance of gene-strand bias in bacteria.

Gene-strand bias is a characteristic feature of bacterial genome organization wherein genes are preferentially encoded on the leading strand of replication, promoting co-orientation of replication and transcription. This co-orientation bias has evolved to protect gene essentiality, expression, and genomic stability from the harmful effects of head-on replication-transcription collisions. However, the origin, variation, and maintenance of gene-strand bias remain elusive. Here, we reveal that the frequency of inversions that alter gene orientation exhibits large variation across bacterial populations and negatively correlates with gene-strand bias. The density, distance, and distribution of inverted repeats show a similar negative relationship with gene-strand bias explaining the heterogeneity in inversions. Importantly, these observations are broadly evident across the entire bacterial kingdom uncovering inversions and inverted repeats as primary factors underlying the variation in gene-strand bias and its maintenance. The distinct catalytic subunits of replicative DNA polymerase have co-evolved with gene-strand bias, suggesting a close link between replication and the origin of gene-strand bias. Congruently, inversion frequencies and inverted repeats vary among bacteria with different DNA polymerases. In summary, we propose that the nature of replication determines the fitness cost of replication-transcription collisions, establishing a selection gradient on gene-strand bias by fine-tuning DNA sequence repeats and, thereby, gene inversions.

The functional significance of the RPA- and PCNA-dependent recruitment of Pif1 to DNA.

Pif1 family helicases are multifunctional proteins conserved in eukaryotes, from yeast to humans. They are important for the genome maintenance in both nuclei and mitochondria, where they have been implicated in Okazaki fragment processing, replication fork progression and termination, telomerase regulation and DNA repair. While the Pif1 helicase activity is readily detectable on naked nucleic acids in vitro, the in vivo functions rely on recruitment to DNA. We identify the single-stranded DNA binding protein complex RPA as the major recruiter of Pif1 in budding yeast, in addition to the previously reported Pif1-PCNA interaction. The two modes of the Pif1 recruitment act independently during telomerase inhibition, as the mutations in the Pif1 motifs disrupting either of the recruitment pathways act additively. In contrast, both recruitment mechanisms are essential for the replication-related roles of Pif1 at conventional forks and during the repair by break-induced replication. We propose a molecular model where RPA and PCNA provide a double anchoring of Pif1 at replication forks, which is essential for the Pif1 functions related to the fork movement.

Direct observation of a crescent-shape chromosome in expanded Bacillus subtilis cells.

Bacterial chromosomes are folded into tightly regulated three-dimensional structures to ensure proper transcription, replication, and segregation of the genetic information. Direct visualization of chromosomal shape within bacterial cells is hampered by cell-wall confinement and the optical diffraction limit. Here, we combine cell-shape manipulation strategies, high-resolution fluorescence microscopy techniques, and genetic engineering to visualize the shape of unconfined bacterial chromosome in real-time in live Bacillus subtilis cells that are expanded in volume. We show that the chromosomes predominantly exhibit crescent shapes with a non-uniform DNA density that is increased near the origin of replication (oriC). Additionally, we localized ParB and BsSMC proteins - the key drivers of chromosomal organization - along the contour of the crescent chromosome, showing the highest density near oriC. Opening of the BsSMC ring complex disrupted the crescent chromosome shape and instead yielded a torus shape. These findings help to understand the threedimensional organization of the chromosome and the main protein complexes that underlie its structure.

Visualizing the dynamics of DNA replication and repair at the single-molecule level.

During cell division, the genome of each eukaryotic cell is copied by thousands of replisomes-large protein complexes consisting of several dozen proteins. Recent studies suggest that the eukaryotic replisome is much more dynamic than previously thought. To directly visualize replisome dynamics in a physiological context, we recently developed a single-molecule approach for imaging replication proteins in Xenopus egg extracts. These extracts contain all the soluble nuclear proteins and faithfully recapitulate DNA replication and repair in vitro, serving as a powerful platform for studying the mechanisms of genome maintenance. Here we present detailed protocols for conducting single-molecule experiments in nuclear egg extracts and preparing key reagents. This workflow can be easily adapted to visualize the dynamics and function of other proteins implicated in DNA replication and repair.

An automated image analysis pipeline to quantify the coordination and overlap of transcription and replication activity in mammalian genomes.

Transcription-replication conflicts (TRCs) represent a potent endogenous source of replication stress. Besides the spatial and temporal coordination of replication and transcription programs, cells employ many additional mechanisms to resolve TRCs in a timely manner, thereby avoiding replication fork stalling and genomic instability. Proximity ligation assays (PLA) using antibodies against actively elongating RNA Polymerase II (RNAPIIpS2) and PCNA to detect proximity (<40nm) between transcribing RNA polymerases and replication forks can be used to assess and quantify TRC levels in cells. A complementary fluorescence microscopy approach to assess the spatial coordination of transcription and replication activities in the nucleus is to quantify the colocalization (200-400nm) between active transcription and ongoing replication using immunofluorescence staining with an antibody against elongating RNA Polymerase II (RNAPIIpS2) and EdU-Click-it pulse-labelling, respectively. Despite significant efforts to automate image analysis, the need for manual verification, correction, and complementation of automated processes creates a bottleneck for efficient, high-throughput and large-scale imaging. Here, we describe an automated Fiji image analysis macro that allows the user to automate the measurement of RNAPIIpS2 and EdU levels and extract the key parameters such as transcription-replication (TR) colocalization and TRC-PLA foci count from single cells in a high throughput manner. While we showcase the usability of this analysis pipeline for quantifying TR colocalization and TRC-PLA in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), the analysis pipeline is designed as a generally applicable tool allowing the quantification of nuclear signals, colocalization and foci count in various model systems and cell types.

Assessment of DNA fibers to track replication dynamics.

DNA replication is a complex and tightly regulated process that must proceed accurately and completely if the cell is to faithfully transmit genetic material to its progeny. Organisms have thus evolved complex mechanisms to deal with the myriad exogenous and endogenous sources of replication impediments to which the cell is subject. These mechanisms are of particular relevance to cancer biology, given that such "replication stress" frequently foreshadows genome instability during cancer pathogenesis, and that many traditional chemotherapies and a number of precision medicines function by interfering with the progress of DNA replication. Visualization of the progress and dynamics of DNA replication in living cells was historically a major challenge, neatly surmounted by the development of DNA fiber assays that utilize the fluorescent detection of halogenated nucleotides to track replication forks at single-molecule resolution. This methodology has been widely applied to study the dynamics of unperturbed DNA replication, as well as the cellular responses to various replication stress scenarios. In recent years, subtle modifications to DNA fiber assays have facilitated assessment of the stability of nascent DNA at stalled replication forks, as well as the detection of single-stranded DNA gaps and their subsequent filling by error-prone polymerases. Here, we present and discuss several iterations of the fiber assay and suggest methodologies for the analysis of the data obtained.

Nascent DNA sequencing and its diverse applications in genome integrity research.

Multiple DNA repair pathways and biological responses to DNA damage have evolved to protect cells from various types of lesions to which they are subjected. Although DNA repair systems are mechanistically distinct, all process the damaged region and then insert new bases to fill the gap. In 1969, Robert Painter developed an assay called "unscheduled" DNA synthesis (UDS), which measures DNA repair synthesis as the uptake of radiolabeled DNA precursors distinct from replicative synthesis. Contemporary detection of nascent DNA during repair by next-generation sequencing grants genome-wide information about the nature of lesions that threaten genome integrity. Recently, we developed the SAR-seq (synthesis associated with repair sequencing) method, which provides a high-resolution view of UDS. SAR-seq has been utilized to map programmed DNA repair sites in non-dividing neurons, replication initiation zones, monitor 53BP1 function in countering end-resection, and to identify regions of the genome that fail to complete replication during S phase but utilize repair synthesis during mitosis (MiDAS). As an example of SAR-seq, we present data showing that sites replicated during mitosis correspond to common fragile sites, which have been linked to tumor progression, cellular senescence, and aging.

DNA hypomethylation activates Cdk4/6 and Atr to induce DNA replication and cell cycle arrest to constrain liver outgrowth in zebrafish.

Coordinating epigenomic inheritance and cell cycle progression is essential for organogenesis. UHRF1 connects these functions during development by facilitating maintenance of DNA methylation and cell cycle progression. Here, we provide evidence resolving the paradoxical phenotype of uhrf1 mutant zebrafish embryos which have activation of pro-proliferative genes and increased number of hepatocytes in S-phase, but the liver fails to grow. We uncover decreased Cdkn2a/b and persistent Cdk4/6 activation as the mechanism driving uhrf1 mutant hepatocytes into S-phase. This induces replication stress, DNA damage and Atr activation. Palbociclib treatment of uhrf1 mutants prevented aberrant S-phase entry, reduced DNA damage, and rescued most cellular and developmental phenotypes, but it did not rescue DNA hypomethylation, transposon expression or the interferon response. Inhibiting Atr reduced DNA replication and increased liver size in uhrf1 mutants, suggesting that Atr activation leads to dormant origin firing and prevents hepatocyte proliferation. Cdkn2a/b was downregulated pro-proliferative genes were also induced in a Cdk4/6 dependent fashion in the liver of dnmt1 mutants, suggesting DNA hypomethylation as a mechanism of Cdk4/6 activation during development. This shows that the developmental defects caused by DNA hypomethylation are attributed to persistent Cdk4/6 activation, DNA replication stress, dormant origin firing and cell cycle inhibition.

Linear DNA-driven recombination in mammalian mitochondria.

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) recombination in animals has remained enigmatic due to its uniparental inheritance and subsequent homoplasmic state, which excludes the biological need for genetic recombination, as well as limits tools to study it. However, molecular recombination is an important genome maintenance mechanism for all organisms, most notably being required for double-strand break repair. To demonstrate the existence of mtDNA recombination, we took advantage of a cell model with two different types of mitochondrial genomes and impaired its ability to degrade broken mtDNA. The resulting excess of linear DNA fragments caused increased formation of cruciform mtDNA, appearance of heterodimeric mtDNA complexes and recombinant mtDNA genomes, detectable by Southern blot and by long range PacBio® HiFi sequencing approach. Besides utilizing different electrophoretic methods, we also directly observed molecular complexes between different mtDNA haplotypes and recombination intermediates using transmission electron microscopy. We propose that the known copy-choice recombination by mitochondrial replisome could be sufficient for the needs of the small genome, thus removing the requirement for a specialized mitochondrial recombinase. The error-proneness of this system is likely to contribute to the formation of pathological mtDNA rearrangements.

The cell cycle revisited: DNA replication past S phase preserves genome integrity.

Accurate and complete DNA duplication is critical for maintaining genome integrity. Multiple mechanisms regulate when and where DNA replication takes place, to ensure that the entire genome is duplicated once and only once per cell cycle. Although the bulk of the genome is copied during the S phase of the cell cycle, increasing evidence suggests that parts of the genome are replicated in G2 or mitosis, in a last attempt to secure that daughter cells inherit an accurate copy of parental DNA. Remaining unreplicated gaps may be passed down to progeny and replicated in the next G1 or S phase. These findings challenge the long-established view that genome duplication occurs strictly during the S phase, bridging DNA replication to DNA repair and providing novel therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment.